Blog-posts are sorted by the tags you see below. You can filter the listing by checking/unchecking individual tags. Doubleclick or Shift-click a tag to see only its entries. For more informations see: About the Blog.
here is the fourth in a series of blogposts about our forthcoming nextbigthing that we still call vvvv50 (50). If you haven't already done so please first read the previous issues with the titles:
So "Generics", uff, sounds so serious, I know. Still we have to mention them now because it will help you understand things further down the road. And you'll be surprised how easy the concept is to grasp. Promised.
In vvvv45 (45) we don't have generic nodes. What we have instead is a lot of identical nodes like eg. "Zip" available for different datatypes. There is a Zip (Value), a Zip (String), a Zip (Color)... and the nodebrowser is full of such duplicates for a lot of nodes, like GetSlice, Select, Queue,... all of which are nodes where the operation they do for us is actually independent of the datatype they handle. We can call such operations "generic" in the sense that if for example you think of the functionality of a Zip it is not really important to know whether it zips slices of a spread of strings or a spread of colors. Easy? Yep.
Only recently we've introduced a way for plugin developers to easily create duplicates of those generic nodes for their own datatypes but that is really only a workaround to the fact that we don't have support for generics built right into 45. Still better than nothing, see: generic-nodes.
Now when we say 50 has support for generics we can advertise that in two ways:
First, the nodebrowser will have less nodes to choose from because it can leave out many duplicates (well, it will have many more other nodes but at least no datatype-duplicates). If you want a Zip you don't have to decide for which type you want it. Just place it in the patch, connect anything to it and you're done. 50 will figure out what you mean.
Secondly (and this is probably a bit more abstract to wrap your head around, but please try:) when you patch an operation you can be unspecific about the datatypes of its inputs and outputs. Sounds exciting? Here is an example: Consider someone patched the functionality of a Queue. This is what it could look like in 45 and 50:
Reading those two patches:
The Inlets and Outlets (Item, Insert, ..) of both implementations are the same and the FrameDelay, as we've already learned, is replaced by a property (called "Items" here). And while both kind of look generic, in the 45 implementation we see the Item obviously is a value IOBox. Therefore we know that this is a specific implementation for values.
In the 50 implementation you see all the operations (clear, insert, take) are working on the generic collection type Spread, ie. they have not yet been forced to operate on a specific type like Spread of value or Spread of color. And you can easily identify pins, in- and outputs and the property that are generic as they are visualized in a different way (ie. only showing their contour). So here is a single implementation of a queue that works for any datatype at a time, even ones that you create yourself (more on that in the next post).
What you take away here is that 50 comes with a set of generic spread operations (insert, take, zip,...) for handling any kind of data and the problem you sometimes faced in 45 where individual spread operations were only available for specific datatypes, is no more.
And the best of it all which is really only a side-note here:
For all those basic generic spread operations we don't have to write a single line of code. In 50 we can magically make use of that functionality as it comes with the .net library. Besides the fact that this saves us a lot of time it also means those basic operations can be assumed virtually bug-free, not only because we didn't write them but also because Microsoft has been taking care of testing that code since years.
That just for a little soothing happynew50 update. Now fasten your seatbelts for the next issue with the blockbuster title "Custom Datatypes".
If what you just learned makes you feel like inserting coin, don't hesitate and click: /downloads|vvvv?.
This one is for all pixelpeople out there.
From now on vvvv can talk, control, send and receive images to and from your Adobe Photoshop started on any networked machine. Layers, Groups, Masks, Smart Objects, Adjustment and Filter layers, Tools, File Operations... you name it, everything can be controlled remotely.
If all you want to do is to stream images from a running Photoshop instance, just take the Photoshop (EX9.Texture) and you are done.
The Photoshop nodes are coming with the addonpack and there is a special section in the girlpower folder, which is your first destination as always:
The possibilities of scripting Photoshop are endless, we're just scratching the surface and prepared an easy way to do so along with some examples and documentation.
At the moment DX9 is used for input/output of textures, but thanks to the modular structure there are only 3 modules waiting for a DX11 version:
Available for testing in latest alpha.
here is the third in a series of blogposts about our forthcoming nextbigthing that we still call vvvv50 (50). If you haven't already done so please first read the previous issues with the titles:
Here is a simple one in that there is not really much new. We're basically trying to sell you an old idea from vvvv45 (45) under a new name, a better name. Together with a new visual representation this will make things easier to think and talk about: Properties (formerly ridiculously called FrameDelays)
45-style: whats going on here?
When in 45 we create a FrameDelay node and combine it with a link that goes back up the graph against the typical dataflow that wording and visualization describes very well whats going on internally. But do we care what vvvv is doing internally? Not really, so why make such a fuzz about it in the patch. Instead lets see how humans would think/talk about whats going on there.
Obviously the patch has two properties best named "Velocity" and "Position" and there is an acceleration coming that influences the velocity which in turn influences the position. So instead of using the notion of "framedelay loops", 50 puts emphasis on the fact that besides operations (Colors) we also have properties that name the data held in a patch. A property has a user-choosable name and of course a datatype (eg, value, color, string,..) and we can set (write data to) and get (read data from) it.
50-style: ah someone clearly computes a position from velocity and acceleration.
In order to get or set a property you need so called Getters or Setters, represented in 50 by circles that you can connect from and to. True, that looks a bit like 45-style Send/Receive nodes but it is something different. Remember that there is no frame delay between S/R nodes in 45. Here though it is always made sure that each frame first all Getters are read from and only then all Setters are written to (causing quasi a frame of delay but you don't really have to think about it that way anymore).
Also note that by forcing you to choose a name for each property (if you're not too lazy and just keep the defaults) 50 can render you a fancy human readable overview of all data in a patch. This overview doubles as a central place where you can manage (ie, add, remove, rename, ...) all your properties.
So if someone asks, this is why you like properties:
Thats already it for this episode. Liked what you learned? Insert coin: /downloads|vvvv?.
here is a supasmall thing. But it can be supausefull. So i thought you should know rightaway: We're all familiar with noisy signals coming from sensors and the simplest thing in vvvv to do to calm such a signal always was to use a Damper (Animation). But of course that introduces a lag, which is sometimes unwanted.
Enter the 1€ Filter: A Simple Speed-based Low-pass Filter for Noisy Input in Interactive Systems
All credits to its creators: Géry Casiez, Nicolas Roussel, Daniel Vogel and Mitsuru Furuta from which we borrowed the C# implementation.
Available now with more details in the helppatch in the latest alpha.
this is the second in a series of blogposts about our forthcoming nextbigthing that we still call vvvv50 (50). If you haven't already done so please first read the last issue with the title:
Now here is the first real treat. We're starting with a simple one: Colors, or how we like to call them: Operations.
First here is a bit you may not have been aware of: When in vvvv45 (45) you create subpatches this is actually only for your own sanity. vvvv itself does not see those but only deals with all your nodes as if they were in one big patch. So in 45 every cascaded system of patches can actually be seen as only one very big patch. And even more so actually everything together can be seen as one big function/operation that is executed every frame. Quite shocking, innit? In 50 this is very different in that the visual structure has actual meaning to it. Good news: You can keep your assumptions, only now they will really work out.
As an example let's have a look at two patches in 45 which are called "PointIsWithinCircle" and "PointIsWithinRectangle":
So here each of the two operations is defined and saved in a separate .v4p file. In 50 they look basically exactly the same only that they can also be defined together in one patch like so:
And you really can collect any number of such helper-operations in one patch by just selecting a group of nodes and giving them a name. Like this multiple operations can be saved in one .vl file. Now this is obviously cool on the one hand but you may also immediately think of scenarios where this has more implications (think: project structure, versioning,...). But let's not ruin the party with such thoughts already. So anyway you just learned that in 50 a patch can be a container for defining more than one operation. Easy.
Having a closer look at the 50 screenshot you see something you haven't seen before. People call those things "Colors" and while they are basically evil, when used in the right way they can actually be quite helpful. Here we use them to visually distinguish between different operations in one patch. You may argue you'd not need colors for this because the operations are all placed next to each other anyway. Indeed, but note that this is really just the most simple case. Think of multiple operations in one patch exchanging data (via links) between each other...we'll come to that in a later blogpost.
For people familiar with c# here is a transcription of the patch that you see:
So you also see how 50 clearly translates the signature of such operations to a visual representation with the colored header and footer of the operation resembling the function-header and line of return that are embracing the implementation.
Here is another example of an operation returning multiple results. Again nothing special you're already used to that from 45 only here the colors encompassing the output pins speak a clearer picture.
You know from 45 that any operation you defined in a patch can be placed as a node inside another patch. Same in 50. Doubleclick a patch to bring up the nodebrowser and select the operation you want to use as a node.
So all-in-all no big deal right? Only that inch better and finally, colors. Have a suggestion where we would allow users to choose their own colors? Get a life...
...but then also come back for the next article in this series revealing more awesome from the future of programming.
Liked what you read? Insert coin: /downloads|vvvv?.
It's been a while again since we last dropped news about that next big thing we still call vvvv50 (50). So in order to get the hype slowly started here are some further notes...
First a quick recap of what we have with vvvv45 (45) so far: For the first ~6 years in existence vvvv was a rather monolithic thing. We sloppily called it "a multipurpose toolkit" and really only later found out ourselves that it was actually made of 4 parts:
Still very much monoltithic in that there was no way for the user to change any of those. Only when in 2008 we introduced the plugininterface vvvv became more modular in that it allowed users to create their own nodes, and boy they did (->addonpack, dx11-pack, cv.image-pack, ...).
So the library part was addressed but critizism remained:
According to the great Joel Spolsky the single worst mistake you can do when writing a software, is starting from scratch. So we did.
So here is our bold plan, this is what we're aiming at (longterm):
Now if that sounds familiar as in "so whats the big difference?" then exactly. Instead of saying it will be completely different we can also say that it will be very much the same only much better. People tend to prefer hearing either. We couldn't decide...
Anyway we're at a point with this where we have bits from all 4 parts implemented and can do simple demos. But mostly we're still focusing on the "visual programming language" which we consider the foundation of the pleasure we want you to have with 50.
The great thing about 45 is still that it is simple to learn. Say that again..!? No really, if you approach it the right way (arrogant!) it actually is. There is a huge library of nodes that is hard to grasp, true, but the things you have to know about the visual language vvvv are only a few:
Those are basically the language features of 45. Specifically the concept of Spreads is what makes vvvv stand out. It allows you to do simple things quickly but as things get more complex they are quite cumbersome to work with. We call this "low-level" while the goal of our new visual language is to be able to work more "high-level", ie. less thinking about concepts that make things easy to understand for the computer but more thinking in human terms.
So with 50 we're introducing a number of new language features that will make it easier for the user to create more complex programs. Here is the buzz of what we have so far:
Sounds scary? Naa... you'll see, all a breeze. Really the basics are not changing: You'll have nodes and pins to connect, a renderer, a quad, ... nothing new. If you're not using any of the new features you can still work kind of 45-style only then you'll not be seeing any of the productivity-increase you can gain from using them.
Specifically as you'll not need to use them all right away and you'll be using them without noticing anyway. But in order to talk about them we need to call them names.
In a forthcoming series of blogposts we'll show you how working with those features will feel like. If you already like what you've read so far and want to buy the cat in the sack we're always up for a /downloads|vvvv?.
To you suckers for framed keys,
right into this gorgeous sommerloch we bring to you the initial public offering of our next generation TimelinerSA: a standalone timelining application that sends out its values via OSC and as such a candidate for becoming the successor to the rusty original TimelinerSA.
We started this from scratch for all the wrong reasons. Basically we were looking for a simple application to test our new gui framework Posh and mostly in order to have a real world usecase we decided to start redoing the timeline. So while at this point it is still lacking quite some of the old timelines features it already has some shiny new stuff:
Missing are foremost:
and some more, see timeliners issues on github
And as soon as we have the node-version this time it should not be too far out to hope for proper GetTrack/SetTrack nodes for recording values or doing your own evaluating of the keyframes...
For now it still has one major bugger: when deleting a keyframe while hovering it with the mouse everything will freeze. If you get in that situation just press F5 to reload the page. Also big thanks to the patience of all alpha-testers.
Now get it here and in the comments (here) please let us know whats your favorite missing features that makes this thing still useless for you. Hopefully this will let us prioritize further development on timeliner.
If you already like what you see we'd appreciate a /timelinersa|Timeliner?.
Ah and yes it is all opensource: See Timeliner on github.
When developing a GUI application you have to decide on a ui-framework for windowing and drawing. Being a .net developer, typical choices would be WinForms, WPF or GTK# for the windowing part and System.Drawing, Cairo, SharpDX or OpenTK for the drawing.
When hoping for a GUI that at some point will run across platform borders WPF and SharpDX are no options anymore. When even thinking mobile you'll have totally different windowing needs anyway and the typical way would be to do the drawing in OpenTK so at least that part is possibly portable and fast. Still you'd have to maintain separate windowing code for each platform.
In an ideal world you'd not want to think about platform specific issues and especially not maintain all the separate codepaths resulting from whatever compromise you choose.
Luckily mankind came up with that internet-thing and now that we're quite some years into its long-evoked 2.0 phase it feels like they have mostly agreed on quite solid standards and even have implemented them across the current world of devices. So today we are in this privileged position to only face one platform that is: the browser. If it runs in the browser it runs on any device.
But wait, the browser, that was that java(kiddy)script-thing, right? You'd obviously not seriously want to go down there. So isn't there a way to write a GUI that runs in the browser without writing a single line of kiddyscript? Well of course there is and the fact that you're not the first one coming up with that unpopular idea, it should only give you strength to reinvent the same with a focus on your own needs.
Introducing Posh - a flat-ui-framwork that misuses the browser as a windowing/drawing environment for your c#/.net based applications by pushing SVG snippets to it while receiving events from it in return.
Image taken from the internet to attract more people on facebook to click the link of this posting and also to give the text some structure.
Posh exists of two parts:
So essentially in your application all you do is build an SVG-DOM (possibly even by simply loading .svg files) and react to normal .net mouse/keyboard-events that you can attach to SVG-elements. That means when building your application you don't have to think about anything windowing/drawing related except building the DOM describing your UI. Also styling is completely for free via CSS.
We provide a simple demo-app that should also be a good starting point if you want to create your own posh-based app. Clone Posh and then start
to get an idea. If you're interested in a more advanced usecase have a look at Timeliner.
Inspired by this forum post, the SVG nodes got two new companions which make it easy to render a spread of textures from a spread of SVG elements.
If you put an AsDocument (SVG) node right after it, it will create a spread of SVG documents for each SVG element at its input. And since the SVGTexture (EX9.Texture) is also spreadable, you can render a bunch of textures at once.
The update to CEF 3 brings the following features:
But there're also some new limitations we came across in our first tests:
We encourage everyone to test the node and report issues as usual in the alpha forum.
anonymous user login