previously on devvvvlopment: vl-networking-and-async
With beta35 (including VL) out in the wild and people apparently starting to use it (see forum threads about it) we're quite happy with the feedback so far. We know of people already including VL in their daily patching and getting the hang of it. Others are still more cautious and are waiting for better documentation or are hoping for node17 to open their eyes. All fair enough, no pressure.. in any case the question is of course:
One of the many aspects that vl will be different when compared to vvvv is its node-library. In vvvv we have a closed-source base-library (written in delphi and closely bound to the vvvv core) plus a wide range of open-source nodes including community contributions (written in c# via a plugin-interface). For vl we'll still distinguish between a base-library and the rest, but all libraries will work the same way, ie not be bound to the core. And not even need a plugininterface. And be open-source.
So from the beginning in vl we separated core from libraries and already have a git-repository including all of VLs libraries organized in neat packages (as you can basically already see in your beta35\lib\packs) that we're ready to open. Why haven't we done so already? Well, by releasing library source-code we're kind of committing to a style that everyone should be able to use to write nodes for vl. Therefore this is really a crucial part that we simply wanted to give a second look.
Remember when at node15 we teased how to define nodes for vl? Everything already felt fairly simple indeed. The typeimporter, a breeze. As mentioned in previous blog-posts we've been continuously importing libraries ourselves since then and noted a few things that we needed to improve to make the workflow for future library developers even more convenient.
So this is what we're reworking at the moment and what we hope to be releasing soon:
This will reduce the barrier for developers enormously because everything they have to do to contribute to the vl nodelibrary, will be very little vl-specific and very close to what any c#/.net developer is doing anyway.
Other than that our focus until node17 will continue to be the integration of vl with vvvv, improving documentation and adding the one or other smaller feature. So, that at node17 we have a strong foundation to teach on and hopefully even already some new, contributed libraries..
Until the next update,
nice! and I hope after node17 vl will be able to move out from their parents' basement ;)
moving out of the basement makes only sense if the bicycle gets some wheels hence DX11 rendering, c# integration and the shader editor. so pretty much what we have now. looking forward to it...
it's made in C# you develop for it in C# and then if you don't want to spend too much time in visual studio for some reason it's just a matter of taste what scripting language you implement through the library importer (like IronPython, CSX or Edge.js).
Vulkan or DX12 is a harder nut but both have C# bindings. I vote for keeping it as low level and as close to the actual library as possible. Also I'm against built in editors, atom.io, sublime text or visual studio will always do a way better job. So I'm rather voting for listening to file changes rather than reinventing the wheel.
anonymous user login