» vvvv_50beta35.2
This site relies heavily on Javascript. You should enable it if you want the full experience. Learn more.

vvvv_50beta35.2

We got more feedback on VL since beta35 and we are really really happy about that! It's true. True!
And since you know how much we dig VL, you will believe me, even though i did everything to sound silly. Besides, also some vvvv issues were reported.

While this is not meant to be the biggest release ever, we still took the chance, addressed some of them and dropped the improvements into a maintenance release, just to make sure to get back to a faster release cycle.

Besides all the fixes that actually make you want to use this release, here are some additional small features:

  • vvvv: Patches/modules can now be cloned like plugins via ctrl+click in nodebrowser.
  • VL: Drag a link and a point will be inserted.
One note on this version for users that already used VL: We took the chance to do small modifications of the model. When saving your documents with this new version this will result in VL files that beta35 can't read. So please test your project with the new vvvversion, make sure everything runs fine and try to not to return to an earlier version. We'll try to keep the model more stable in the future.

Irritainment feature and puzzle of the day "Partial Type Annotation":

Partial Type Annotation. You'll get it exactly when you need it and not before.

Check out the Change Log below!
Have a lovvvvely day, yours devs

EDIT: this is a hot fix for beta35.1, thanks eps for reporting, sorry for the inconvenience.

gregsn, Tuesday, Feb 21st 2017 Digg | Tweet | Delicious 3 comments  
guest 22/02/2017 - 17:16

The receive nodes wont get red anymore when the selected sender is renamed or deleted. Pretty hard debugging in such cases.. :(

joreg 22/02/2017 - 17:21

@guest please start a forum topic about this. please provide a patch and instructions on how to reproduce. also is this a change between b35 and b35.2 or between other versions?

featherfurl 27/02/2017 - 19:20

The new midifile and miditrack nodes have already been really useful!

  • 1

anonymous user login

Shoutbox

~18h ago

joreg: @eglod: if not, we're doing something wrong... but did you check any of the other timeline options? animation

~19h ago

andresc4: Sometimes people finalize a project and can donate a good amount that month, but nobody knows what will happen on the next one :D

~19h ago

andresc4: @vux as @eno say, I think a 1 time payment of any given value its a good option also

~20h ago

ggml: where id the vl search algorythm implementation discussion?

~20h ago

eglod: @ catweasel, o.k. may be, I have to learn vl. Thank You catweasel! Is this possible with 84 years, what think You?

~22h ago

catweasel: I guess part of the issue, is payment is $ which means transaction fees on every payement will add up!

~1d ago

u7angel: @eno, it is a hassle for us too but its worth it i think.

~1d ago

eno: @vux @u7angel, of course, but an annual fee would be much more convenient for the accounting.

~1d ago

u7angel: @eno, the idea is to generate a steady income to motivate continious development.